SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Mhc new judges name reco

Uncategorized

Mhc new judges name reco

[4/6, 15:06] Sekarreporter: Sources: Central Government has recommended 4 names (1) V. Chandrasekaran, (2) M.Karunanidhi (Madurai) and 2 assistant solicitor generals (3) Victoriagowri (Madurai) (4) Mr.Rajesh Vivekananda Asst.general of india candidates for consideration before...

Sathyamangalam tiger case THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.1830 of 2022 For Respondents       : Mr.J.Ravindran,  (for R1 & R2)                         (in W.P.No.1830 of 2022)   Additional Advocate General,                                               Assisted by Dr.T.Seenivasan,        Special Govt. Pleader (Forest) : Mr.P.Muthukumar ( for R4 & R6)           State Govt. Pleader,   Assisted by Mr.S.J.Md. Sathik,   Government Advocate

Uncategorized

Sathyamangalam tiger case THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.1830 of 2022 For Respondents       : Mr.J.Ravindran,  (for R1 & R2)                         (in W.P.No.1830 of 2022)   Additional Advocate General,                                               Assisted by Dr.T.Seenivasan,        Special Govt. Pleader (Forest) : Mr.P.Muthukumar ( for R4 & R6)           State Govt. Pleader,   Assisted by Mr.S.J.Md. Sathik,   Government Advocate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved  on :  15.03.2022 Delivered on : 06.04.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.1830 of 2022...

directions of this Court, has to be appreciated. At the same time, while closing the contempt petition, we expect from the respondents that if any manhole still remains uncovered and unnoticed by the Court or by the petitioner or the manhole cover is damaged, they would immediately address it, so as to avoid any type of incident that had occurred in the past due to uncovered or damaged manholes, thereby maintaining the area around the High Court in the same condition as it is maintained now. HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Cont.P.No.2340 of 2018 .

Uncategorized

directions of this Court, has to be appreciated. At the same time, while closing the contempt petition, we expect from the respondents that if any manhole still remains uncovered and unnoticed by the Court or by the petitioner or the manhole cover is damaged, they would immediately address it, so as to avoid any type of incident that had occurred in the past due to uncovered or damaged manholes, thereby maintaining the area around the High Court in the same condition as it is maintained now. HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Cont.P.No.2340 of 2018 .

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.4.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Cont.P.No.2340 of 2018 Mr.V.Tamizhanban       .. Petitioner vs 1.Dr.D.Karthikeyan, IAS,...

Seniority promotion order quashed full order of. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.10135 and 18224 of 2013

Uncategorized

Seniority promotion order quashed full order of. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.10135 and 18224 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESEVED ON:   04.02.2022                                     DELIVERED ON: 04.04.2022                    CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.10135 and 18224 of 2013   W.P.No.10135 of 2013   1.V.Rajaram...

nonexamination of two crucial eye witnesses makes the prosecution case about the existence of a prior concert and prearranged plan extremely doubtful – Prosecution has failed to prove ingredients of Section 34 of IPC – Appellant has been implicated only with the aid of section 34 – Appellant is acquitted of the charges against him – Appeal allowed. 

Uncategorized

nonexamination of two crucial eye witnesses makes the prosecution case about the existence of a prior concert and prearranged plan extremely doubtful – Prosecution has failed to prove ingredients of Section 34 of IPC – Appellant has been implicated only with the aid of section 34 – Appellant is acquitted of the charges against him – Appeal allowed. 

  GOOD DAY SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka, JJ. ) GADADHAR CHANDRA — Appellant  Vs.  THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — Respondent Criminal Appeal...

Madras high court orders april 6

Uncategorized

Madras high court orders april 6

[4/5, 12:01] Sekarreporter: ஆர்.கே.செல்வமணிக்கு எதிராக பிடிவாரண்டு கோர்ட்டு உத்தரவு   சென்னை, ஏப்.5- பிரபல சினிமா இயக்குனர் ஆர்.கே.செல்வமணி, முன்னாள் எம்.எல்.ஏ. அருள் அன்பரசு ஆகியோர் தனியார் தொலைக்காட்சிக்கு கடந்த 2016-ம் ஆண்டு பேட்டி அளித்தனர். அப்போது, பைனான்ஸ்சியர் முகுந்த் சந்த போத்ரா குறித்து சில...

In view of the aforesaid, there shall be an order of interim stay of the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge in regard to the running of the Bar by the TASMAC shop in question, finding prima-facie case in favour of the appellants/TASMAC in reference to the arguments made by the learned Advocate General. THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE   and                   D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J cs W.A.No.883 of 2022 and       C.M.P.No.5926 of 2022

Uncategorized

In view of the aforesaid, there shall be an order of interim stay of the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge in regard to the running of the Bar by the TASMAC shop in question, finding prima-facie case in favour of the appellants/TASMAC in reference to the arguments made by the learned Advocate General. THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE   and                   D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J cs W.A.No.883 of 2022 and       C.M.P.No.5926 of 2022

W.A.No.883 of 2022 and C.            M.P.No.5926 of 2022 THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J (The Order of the Court was made by The Honourable Chief Justice) Issue notice to the respondent returnable...

மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலில் புன்னைவனநாதர் சன்னதியில் இருந்த மயில் சிலையின் அலகில் மலர் தான் இருந்தது

Uncategorized

மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலில் புன்னைவனநாதர் சன்னதியில் இருந்த மயில் சிலையின் அலகில் மலர் தான் இருந்தது

மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலில் புன்னைவனநாதர் சன்னதியில் இருந்த மயில் சிலையின் அலகில் மலர் தான் இருந்தது என்பதற்கான ஆதாரங்களை தாக்கல் செய்ய அறநிலையத் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. சென்னை மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலில் 2004ம் ஆண்டில் குடமுழுக்கு விழா நடைபெற்ற போது புன்னைவனநாதர் சன்னதியில்...

THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE,  MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI – 600 003. Present : Thiru.T.H.Mohammed Farooq, M.A., M.L., Sessions Judge,  Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai. Dated,  Monday, the 4th day of  April, 2022. Spp arthi basker

Uncategorized

THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE,  MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI – 600 003. Present : Thiru.T.H.Mohammed Farooq, M.A., M.L., Sessions Judge,  Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai. Dated,  Monday, the 4th day of  April, 2022. Spp arthi basker

J.F.No. 61 – Page  Judicial Form No. 61 (Cr.R.P 106) IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE,  MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI – 600 003. Present : Thiru.T.H.Mohammed Farooq, M.A., M.L., Sessions Judge,  Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai....

9.The Registry in all the Courts must ensure that the mandatory procedures under Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 have been complied with strictly in all respects, including the mentioning of name description, place of residence and all other necessary details. C.M.P(MD)No.1048 of 2022 in S.A.(MD)No.19 of 2020 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to permit the petitioner

Uncategorized

9.The Registry in all the Courts must ensure that the mandatory procedures under Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 have been complied with strictly in all respects, including the mentioning of name description, place of residence and all other necessary details. C.M.P(MD)No.1048 of 2022 in S.A.(MD)No.19 of 2020 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to permit the petitioner

C.M.P(MD)No.1048 of 2022 in S.A.(MD)No.19 of 2020 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to permit the petitioner to bring on record the proposed appellants No.3 and 4 as the legal heirs of...