sekarreporter1: SG Mehta informs the court that he has filed suggestions on the points of differences. He lists out the three main points as under 1. Whether ED has power to seek custody of a person arrested 2. Maintenance of HCP after passing of remand order. 3. Exclusion of time #MadrasHC #SenthilBalaji
[7/7, 14:33] sekarreporter1: Justice CV Karthikeyan of #MadrasHC begins hearing HCP related to Minister V Senthilbalaji. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta as well as Senior Counsel NR Elango have prepared tabulations with respect to differences of opinion between 2 judges who delivered split verdict @THChennai
[7/7, 14:34] sekarreporter1: Solicitor General says, he has filed his suggestions on issues on which there is a difference. He reads out the differences on maintenance of HCP, power of ED to seek police custody and so on.
Judge: It fundamentally questions identity of the ED. It says ED has identity crisis.
[7/7, 14:34] sekarreporter1: SG says there are authorities which state that the third judge must answer only the points of difference between the two judges who had delivered a split verdict. NRE requests the judge to look into an annexure filed by him tabulating the differences of opinion.
[7/7, 14:34] sekarreporter1: NRE says, he is not disputing the memo submitted by the SG but says he has made a separate tabulation on the differences of opinion between the two judges and requests the court to look into his tabulation too. He is now reading out the tabulation prepared by him.
[7/7, 14:35] sekarreporter1: Solicitor General says, he has filed his suggestions on issues on which there is a difference. He reads out the differences on maintenance of HCP, power of ED to seek police custody and so on.
Judge: It fundamentally questions identity of the ED. It says ED has identity crisis.
[7/7, 14:36] sekarreporter1: SG Mehta informs the court that he has filed suggestions on the points of differences. He lists out the three main points as under
1. Whether ED has power to seek custody of a person arrested
2. Maintenance of HCP after passing of remand order.
3. Exclusion of time
#MadrasHC #SenthilBalaji
l
![THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s. Vishaal Natural Food Products (I). For Petitioners : Mr.B.Satish Sundar For Respondent : Mr.R.Nalliyappan. [8/3, 18:12] Satis Sunder Mhc Advocate: Judgement of sathikumar kurup.j.quasing complaint under s.138 N.I act holding that security cheque given by the accused to complainant during course of business without a contract between them is not an enforceable debt within the meaning of s.138 of the said act.Proceeding of the lower court quashed. [8/3, 18:12] Sekarreporter1: Super](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)