Vinothpandian: 2008 (4) SCC 300 : krishna kumar Birla vs Rajendra singh ( para 124) : what could be done and has not been done by a court of equity does not create a precedent , it does not even have a persusaive value

[12/9, 11:03] Vinothpandian: 2008 (4) SCC 300 : krishna kumar Birla vs Rajendra singh ( para 124) : what could be done and has not been done by a court of equity does not create a precedent , it does not even have a persusaive value
[12/9, 11:03] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC 329 : Roshina T vs Abdul Azeez : writ jurisdiction not intended to replace ordinary civil remedies by way of civil court or application available to aggrieved person
[12/9, 11:03] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 758 : state bank of india vs nivrutti haribhau type & another : Name sake appeal to blame court by throwing an appeal memo before registry without attending same for year , such type of appeals only lead to wasting litigants time , costs imposed on bank ( section 20 RDDBFI act 1993 )
[12/9, 11:03] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 731 : M/ S priya bhatia vs state bank of patiala : Rights of third party.auction purchaser cannot be set at naught because of one time settlement which was on basis of consent of borrower and creditor ( sec 30 RDDBFI act 1993 )