Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications[1/4, 10:34] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 62 : C Rangaraj vs inspector general of

[1/4, 10:34] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications
[1/4, 10:34] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 62 : C Rangaraj vs inspector general of registration ,santhome : Registration act 1908 sec 22- A : Registering authority cannot act like post office and register any document presented if manifest lack of title apparent ,registering authority cannot register document
[1/4, 10:34] Vinothpandian: 2012(1) CTC 561 : nicholos Piramal India Pvt Ltd vs The inspector general of registration : indian stamp act 1899 section 47-A : held registering authority cannot demand stamp duty more than guide line value of property
[1/4, 10:34] Vinothpandian: 2015(3) CTC 1 : Ranganathan vs narayanan : limitation act 1963 section 3 : court can adjudicate issue of limitation even in absence of defence raised by defendant
[1/4, 10:34] Vinothpandian: AIR 1964 cal 241 : chaturbhuj vs Clive mills co: where the defendant accepted the notice but did not sign the acknowledgement ,the service is good without affixation
[1/4, 10:34] Vinothpandian: 1996(8) SCC 369 : dilwan Singh vs state of Haryana : when neither AD card nor unserved original notice is recieved back ,the notice must be held to be deemed service