Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) SCC 560 : meters and instruments pvt ltd vs kanchan Mehta: In a proceedings under section 138 NI act , it is the discretion of magistrate without causing prejudice to prosecution proceedings to dispense with personal appearance of accused under sec 205 of CRPC 1973 [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian:

    [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) SCC 560 : meters and instruments pvt ltd vs kanchan Mehta: In a proceedings under section 138 NI act , it is the discretion of magistrate without causing prejudice to prosecution proceedings to dispense with personal appearance of accused under sec 205 of CRPC 1973
    [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC ( cri ) 181 : Abdul wahab k vs state of kerala : Public prosecutor under section 321 CRPC 1973 can withdraw from prosecution at any time before the judgement is pronounced , but he has to apply his / her own mind and consider the effect of withdrawal on the society in the event such permission is granted
    [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : KG shanti vs United india insurance co ltd SLP ( civil ) nos 4663- 4664 of 2021 dated 16- 03- 2021 : court should be circumspect in using strong language while penning down its order qua judicial officers
    [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Aparna bhatt & others vs state of madhya pradesh criminal appeal no 329 of 2021 dated 18- 03- 2021 : bail conditions should not mandate require or permit contact between accused and victim , such conditions should seek to protect complainant from any further harassment by accused
    [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Aman Lohia vs kiran Lohia transferred case ( civil ) no 25 of 2021 dated 17- 03- 2021 : family court required to follow procedure under CPC and provide parties with sufficient time and opportunity to present their claim in form of pleadings and evidence before determination of dispute
    [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : K Akbar Ali vs K umar Khan and others SLP no 31844 of 2018 dated 12 – 02 – 2021 : Provisions of order 7 rule 11 CPC are not exhaustive , court has inherent power to see that frivolous or vexatious litigations are not allowed to consume time of court
    [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian: 2020 (4) CTC 497 : Ravindranath GE medical associates pvt ltd chennai vs P Raja rao : while granting interim injunction or continuing existing injunction , court must see if there is bonafide contest between parties , court must also find which side balance of convenience lies ( order 39 CPC 1908 )
    [11/25, 13:19] Vinothpandian: 2017 (9) SCC 469 : chandra devi & etc vs union of india : Every wrong action. is not a fraudulent action , fraud has to be pleaded and proved

You may also like...