Vinothpandian: 2018(3) BC 389 ; India affordable housing solutions vs konmark infra developers : oral plea to contradict written agreement is not tenable in terms of section 91 of evidence act

[12/3, 12:06] Vinothpandian: 2018(3) BC 389 ; India affordable housing solutions vs konmark infra developers : oral plea to contradict written agreement is not tenable in terms of section 91 of evidence act
[12/3, 12:06] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 117 : sarasu vs Ravi : sec 5 limitation act : Application for condoning delay filed under sec 5 to be dealt with liberally and leniently in order to do substantial justice to parties ,length of delay not a material factor for deciding application under section 5 of limitation act
[12/3, 12:06] Vinothpandian: 2019(4) BC 1 SC : Bajarang shyam sundar Agarwal vs central bank of india : SARFASI act ; If any of tenants claim that he is entitled to possession of secured asset for term of more than year it has to be supported by execution of registered instrument ,if tenant relied on unregistered instrument or oral agreement accompanied by delivery of possession ,tenant is not entitled to possession of secured asset for more than period prescribed under sec 107 of TP act
[12/3, 12:06] Vinothpandian: 2018(1) BC 158 ( DB ) : Kumar Rohit vs Allahabad bank : Auction sale which proceeded on misrepresentation to intending bidders is definitely illegal and liable to be quashed
[12/3, 12:06] Vinothpandian: 2016(1) CTC 493 : Asianet communications p Ltd vs surya TV : no party can transfer any title better than what itself possesses , in a suit for injunction party bound to prove its own title in order to seek injunction
[12/3, 12:07] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC ( cri ) 109 : state of karnataka lokayukta police station vs MR Hiremath : certificate under section.65 ( B ) of the indian evidence act 1872 required at the time when the electronic record is sought to be produced in evidence at the trial not at the stage of framing of charge sheet
[12/3, 12:07] Vinothpandian: 2019 (7) JT 588 : Rathin ghosh vs west Bengal state electricity distribution company : In a disciplinary proceedings , disciplinary authority has exclusive power to impose appropriate punishment keeping in view magnitude and gravity of misconduct
[12/3, 17:08] Vinothpandian: 2001(4) crimes 199 : Bhaskar industries Ltd vs Bhiwani denim and apparels Ltd : sec 205& 317 CRPC : magistrate can allow an accused to make even the first appearance through a counsel and dispense the accused from appearance
[12/3, 17:08] Vinothpandian: 2018(1) LW ( cri ) 554: mareeshwaran S vs state through inspector of police pandal gudi police station , virudhunagar : when a full bench judgement is held to be bad in law by a subsequent bench and there is no indication regarding retrospective operation , held larger bench and latter full bench decision would apply retrospectively