Whats app news roundup nov 7 sekarreporter
[11/7, 06:58] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/ZzoWCz5qUdA
[11/7, 06:58] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/Sw1r3oalJPw
[11/7, 07:00] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/v4ovpAC_Dps
[11/7, 07:06] Sekarreporter 1: [11/7, 07:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/4EsUErEFizI
[11/7, 07:05] Sekarreporter 1: Abdul kuthose judge order
[11/7, 07:55] Sekarreporter 1: இந்தியாவில் புதிய வளர்ச்சிக்கு ஏற்றார் போல நீதி துறையும் மாற்றம் அடைய வேண்டும்.* *புதிய தொழில் நுட்பங்கள் குறிப்பாக செயலிகள் போன்ற அம்சங்களை மெட்ராஸ் பார் கவுன்சில் பயன்படுத்தி, நீதியை அணுகுவதை எளிமையாக்க வேண்டும்* – *சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற வளாகத்தில் நடைபெற்ற விழாவில் தமிழ்நாடு ஆளுநர் ஆர் என் ரவி பேச்சு* https://sekarreporter.com/%e0%ae%87%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%af%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%af-%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%b3%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%9a%e0%af%8d/
[11/7, 07:58] Sekarreporter 1: [11/7, 07:51] Velmurugan Bar Council Member: SRILANKAN LAWYERS 185 FOR 6 in 20 overs ( RANDEEPA 89 N.O. 16×4,1×6, KAMALADASAN 31, AVIJIT 1/29, NAVEEN GAUR 3/24, K.SUNIL GOUD 1/23) lost to INDIAN LAWYERS 189 FOR 5 IN 17.1 OVERS ( ANGEL BHARADWAZ 56 4×6 , 6×4, NEERAJ NARWAL.35, 4×6, 1×6, SELVENDRAN 42 N.O. 3×4 , 6×4, BASANAYAKA 2/16) ÌNDIAN LAWYERS WON 1ST MATCH AGAINST SRILANKAN LAWYERS
[11/7, 07:54] Velmurugan Bar Council Member: Our Selvendran played pivot role in the win by hitting 42 runs in 20 balls. Great knock Selvendran . Keep rocking 👍👏👏
[11/7, 07:54] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[11/7, 11:43] Sekarreporter 1: [11/7, 11:41] Sekarreporter 1: BIG BREAKING: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS 10% RESERVATIONS FOR ECONOMICALLY WEAKER SECTIONS (EWS)
[11/7, 11:41] Sekarreporter 1: Five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court upholds the validity of the Constitution’s 103rd Amendment Act 2019, which provides for the 10 per cent EWS reservation amongst the general category.
Four judges uphold the Act while one judge passes a dissenting judgement.
[11/7, 12:16] Sekarreporter 1: [11/7, 12:11] Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: It is 3:2 it seems. Pls verify…
[11/7, 12:12] Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: CJI and Ravindra Bhatt j have delivered minority verdict. Three judges have upheld the reservation.
[11/7, 12:16] Sekarreporter 1: [11/7, 11:56] Thirumalai Rajagopal Advt: Though the judgement is passed with 3:2 majority, However, technically, all the 5 judges upheld the 10% quota. The dissented judges also upheld the view that reservation can be given by Parliament on Economic Criteria. These two judges dissented only on the exclusion of poor among SC,ST, and other classes.
[11/7, 12:11] Sekarreporter 1: Super
[11/7, 13:24] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/kfTUCX4IYIM
[11/7, 13:24] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/4Sf_Dbymmls
[11/7, 15:09] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/OooqWwcOIAk?feature=share
[11/7, 15:23] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/GGqsRVVsA-o
[11/7, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1589557071808458753?t=j7-4qThD8MkXeqfBEUw8nQ&s=08
[11/7, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/GGqsRVVsA-o
[11/7, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1589557071808458753?t=j7-4qThD8MkXeqfBEUw8nQ&s=08
[11/7, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/GGqsRVVsA-o
[11/7, 16:16] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/rHgQbIhR460
[11/7, 17:10] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/FZEEeqzToVE
[11/7, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/J6QeD9z8C3M
[11/7, 17:30] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/JDm13bGCloA
[11/7, 17:43] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/GGqsRVVsA-o
[11/7, 18:01] Sekarreporter 1: Crl A (MD)Nos.482 and 513 of 2017 M.S.RAMESH, J. and ANAND VENKATESH,J. As a sequel to the earlier order passed by this Court on 10.10.2022, the matter was posted for hearing today. Considering the seriousness of the issue involved in this case, the State was represented by Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram, learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the Director General of Police was represented by Mr. Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, learned State Public Prosecutor. 2.A status report has been filed by the Director General of Police along with the proceedings in Rc.No.70699/A&R-1/2022 dated 04.11.2022. For proper appreciation, the relevant portions in the status report are extracted hereunder: https://sekarreporter.com/crl-a-mdnos-482-and-513-of-2017-m-s-ramesh-j-and-anand-venkateshj-as-a-sequel-to-the-earlier-order-passed-by/
[11/7, 18:39] Sekarreporter 1: [11/7, 18:28] Sekarreporter 1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT*
*Jeyaraman Vs. The State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police*
Crl.A.No.220 of 2014
Dated: 11.10.2022
*HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN* allowed the Criminal Appeal in the matter relating to *“Alleged Dowry Death – Suicide – IPC Ss. 304-b, 498-A”,* and further observed and held as follows:
i) Section 304-B of I.P.C deals with death of a woman otherwise than under normal circumstances within 7 years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death, she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any of her relative of the husband in connection with demand of dowry such death shall be called dowry death. Section 498-A of I.P.C states that any wilful conduct which is likely to drive a woman to commit suicide or harassment with a view to coerce her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand of property or valuable security will attract punishment for a term not exceeding three years and shall also be liable with fine.
ii) Therefore, the ingredient to attract the two penal provisions are: cruelty in connection with demand of dowry, or harassment seeking the property or valuable security.
iii) When there is no proof of dowry demand, the reason for committing suicide has to be examined. In the absence of evidence that soon before the self immolation the victim/deceased wife was subjected to cruelty renders the prosecution case against the appellant for offence under section 304-B of I.P.C as unsustainable.
iv) The best evidence about any cruelty soon before her death could have been only from the neighbours residing in and around the residence of the appellant and the deceased. When none of the witnesses had spoken about that the appellant cannot be held guilty of offence under Section 304-B of I.P.C. The omission to collect information about the previous attempt to commit suicide and treatment given also dents the credibility of the prosecution case. The deliberate omission of the Investigating Officer not requesting the RDO to conduct the enquiry and absence of plausible reason to the said omission warrants the reversal of the judgment of conviction.
v) For the above reasons, it was found that there is reasonable doubt about the prosecution case and the witnesses have not proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
[11/7, 18:28] Sekarreporter 1: 👍👍
[11/7, 18:51] Sekarreporter 1: GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Jeyaraman Vs. The State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police* Crl.A.No.220 of 2014 Dated: 11.10.2022 *HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN* allowed the Criminal Appeal in the matter relating to *“Alleged Dowry Death – Suicide – IPC Ss. 304-b, 498-A”,* and further observed and held as follows: 138 cheque case https://sekarreporter.com/glimpse-of-a-latest-verdict-jeyaraman-vs-the-state-rep-by-deputy-superintendent-of-police-crl-a-no-220-of-2014-dated-11-10-2022-honourable-dr-justice-g-jayachandran-allowed-the-criminal-app/
[11/7, 19:13] Sekarreporter 1: Ews case full order of 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL/CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 55 OF 2019 JANHIT ABHIYAN …PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA …RESPONDENT(S) WITH T.C.(C) No. 8/2021, W.P.(C) No. 596/2019, W.P.(C) No. 446/2019, W.P.(C) No. 427/2019, W.P. (C) No. 331/2019, W.P.(C) No. 343/2019, W.P.(C) No. 798/2019, W.P. (C) No. 732/2019, W.P. (C) No. 854/2019, T.C. (C) No. 12/2021, T.C.(C) No. https://sekarreporter.com/ews-case-full-order-of-1-reportable-in-the-supreme-court-of-india-original-civil-appellate-jurisdiction-writ-petition-civil-no-55-of-2019-janhit-abhiyan-petitioners-versus-union-of-india/
[11/7, 22:02] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/UeCLb_8SDnU
[11/8, 06:35] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/GGqsRVVsA-o
