Follow:
- Next story [3/25, 20:43] sekarreporter1: [3/25, 20:41] sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1639645916025196544?t=Akw5c1a7qqhXldnOoRJ2KQ&s=08 [3/25, 20:41] sekarreporter1: Cji mention senior adv Wilson sir name [3/25, 20:42] sekarreporter1: Congrats mp Wilson sir we proud to hear this again congrats sir [3/25, 20:59] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/V8QUwSRQB58 [3/25, 21:48] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/i7ZuDfJWU4E
- Previous story Actor leena manimagalai case THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.No.5697 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.3140 of 2022 Leena Manimekalai represented For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari, senior counsel for M/s.V.S.Senthilkumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Vivekananthan for M/s.S.D.Alexis Sudhakar Thus, this Court is of the view that it is not advisable to continue the proceedings to be conducted by the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet in C.C.No.344 of 2019. In this view of the matter, this Court sets aside the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai in Tr.C.M.P.No..No.17920 of 2021 and orders transfer of the proceedings in C.C.No.344 of 2019 on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet to the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet is directed to dispose the case as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 16.03.2023 mra Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order To 1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai. 2. IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet. 3. XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet. 4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J. mra order in Crl.O.P.No.5697 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.3140 of 2022 16.03.2023
Recent Posts
- In this regard, the Secretary to Government made a submission that all actions for effective administration will be completed within a period of 15 days and thereafter, further actions will be initiated for the purpose of completing works relating to Kalaimagal Sabha. In this regard, therespondents are directed to file a status report on 04th June, 2024.Page 1 of 2https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judisS.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.Jeni
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the followingterms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights andResponsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act(Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declaredto be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590,26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)23.04.2024Index : YesSpeaking orderNeutral Citation : YesJerTo
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
More
Recent Posts
- In this regard, the Secretary to Government made a submission that all actions for effective administration will be completed within a period of 15 days and thereafter, further actions will be initiated for the purpose of completing works relating to Kalaimagal Sabha. In this regard, therespondents are directed to file a status report on 04th June, 2024.Page 1 of 2https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judisS.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.Jeni
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the followingterms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights andResponsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act(Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declaredto be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590,26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)23.04.2024Index : YesSpeaking orderNeutral Citation : YesJerTo
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner