Follow:
- Next story mhc சிந்தனை, கருத்து ஆகியவற்றின் மீது யாரும் காப்புரிமை கோர முடியாது. அதேநேரம், அந்த சிந்தனை, கருத்தை வெளிப்படுத்தும் விதத்தின் மீதுதான் காப்புரிமை கோர முடியும் என்று சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டு அளித்துள்ள தீர்ப்புகளில் கூறியுள்ளது
- Previous story senthil balaji case 3 hours நின்று கொண்டே NRElango கா இளம் வக்கீல் notes எடுக்கிறார்கள் காரசார வாதம் தெறிக்க விடுகிறார் கோர்ட் பரபரப்பு நிருபர்கள் திணறல்
Recent Posts
- It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an Order or Direction or writ in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, forbearing the official respondents 1 to 6 herein to grant permission for conducting Commercial Exhibitions in the campus of Educational institutions as per 2nd Respondent Letter No.12376/Exhibition/2017 dated 21,12,2017 and as well as based on the Petitioner’s representation dated 22.04.2024and pass such further or other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of case and thus render justice.
- Consider and pass order /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAMWP No.34387 of 2023Tamil Nadu Palli Mattrum Kaloori KalviThiraipada Amaippalargal Sangam,(Tamil Nadu Schooll annd College EducationalFilm Organisation Society),(Registration No.214/2015)Represented by its President
- bar council vice chairman karthikeyan speech வக்கீல் வெற்றி பெறுவது எப்படி
- judge manjula order In the result,(i) W.P.No.25424 of 2021 is allowed and the impugned government order issued by the 1st respondent in G.O.(3D) No.3 School Education [SE(1)] Department, dated 13.07.2021 is quashed and the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to re-do the exercise by rightly issuing two separate selection lists one for the open category and another for the teacher category by following the communal reservation in accordance with the vacancies earmarked as against each community or priority and complete the exercise and issue the revised selection list within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(ii) W.P.Nos.19622 of 2020 and 169, 170, 3398,and 3402 of 2021 are also disposed with the abovedirection.(iii) No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.04.2024 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking Neutral Citation : Yes/No jrs To
- CONCLUSION:-(97)For all the above reasons, the writ petitions stand allowed and the impugned order dated 26.04.2017 in Letter No.24801/UD-VII[1]/2016-3 is hereby quashed. The clarification of limited extent of 13,720 Hectares of lands as catchment area as per Second Master Plan is declared unconstitutional. However, it is open to the respondents to revise the Master Plan taking note of this judgment and in the light of the recommendations of M/s.CUBE in their Final Report strictly adhering to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The respondents shall consult experts and provide necessary infrastructure to ensure protection of water bodies throughout the area where the jurisdiction of CMDA is extended and supply of quality drinking water in sufficient quantity. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.[S.S.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.]30.04.2024
More
Recent Posts
- It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an Order or Direction or writ in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, forbearing the official respondents 1 to 6 herein to grant permission for conducting Commercial Exhibitions in the campus of Educational institutions as per 2nd Respondent Letter No.12376/Exhibition/2017 dated 21,12,2017 and as well as based on the Petitioner’s representation dated 22.04.2024and pass such further or other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of case and thus render justice.
- Consider and pass order /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAMWP No.34387 of 2023Tamil Nadu Palli Mattrum Kaloori KalviThiraipada Amaippalargal Sangam,(Tamil Nadu Schooll annd College EducationalFilm Organisation Society),(Registration No.214/2015)Represented by its President
- bar council vice chairman karthikeyan speech வக்கீல் வெற்றி பெறுவது எப்படி
- judge manjula order In the result,(i) W.P.No.25424 of 2021 is allowed and the impugned government order issued by the 1st respondent in G.O.(3D) No.3 School Education [SE(1)] Department, dated 13.07.2021 is quashed and the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to re-do the exercise by rightly issuing two separate selection lists one for the open category and another for the teacher category by following the communal reservation in accordance with the vacancies earmarked as against each community or priority and complete the exercise and issue the revised selection list within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(ii) W.P.Nos.19622 of 2020 and 169, 170, 3398,and 3402 of 2021 are also disposed with the abovedirection.(iii) No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.04.2024 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking Neutral Citation : Yes/No jrs To
- CONCLUSION:-(97)For all the above reasons, the writ petitions stand allowed and the impugned order dated 26.04.2017 in Letter No.24801/UD-VII[1]/2016-3 is hereby quashed. The clarification of limited extent of 13,720 Hectares of lands as catchment area as per Second Master Plan is declared unconstitutional. However, it is open to the respondents to revise the Master Plan taking note of this judgment and in the light of the recommendations of M/s.CUBE in their Final Report strictly adhering to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The respondents shall consult experts and provide necessary infrastructure to ensure protection of water bodies throughout the area where the jurisdiction of CMDA is extended and supply of quality drinking water in sufficient quantity. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.[S.S.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.]30.04.2024