![Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: https://wp.me/p92Wet-1KP [12/27, 10:29] Sekarreporter1: [12/27, 09:59] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* inviting you to *online* *coaching* for *JUDICIAL](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Actress Jayapradha case was listed before the Hon’ble Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran today்orders reserved
- Previous story செந்தில் பாலாஜி நார்மலாக உள்ளார் ஜாமீன் தரக கூடாது ARL sundaresan ed adv
Recent Posts
- Justice AD Jagadish Chandira says, there’s a doubt whether the injuries were sustained during the road accident or inside Coimbatore prison. Now that inquiry had been conducted by DLSA, the HCP can be closed by directing officials to consider his mother’s representation.[09/05, 11:27] sekarreporter1: JUDGES CLOSE THE HCP with a direction to consider a representation made by Savukku Shankar’s mother for change of prison
- AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONERI, K.Selvaperunthagai, S/o.Kuppuswamy, Indian, aged about 64 Years, President of Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (Indian National Congress), Sathyamurthy Bhavan, 40, Thiru Vi Ka Salai, Chennai 600 002, residing at B15, Tower Block, TNHB Officer Quarters, Taylor Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 600010 do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows: counsel on record Advocates suriya prakasam , chandramohan, victor,damodaran, D selvam , navash , venkadesh, sasikumar,
- [08/05, 19:16] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE COMPLAINT UNDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 IS MAINTAINABLE AFTER OBTAINING THE DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY MUTUAL CONSENT?
- [09/05, 08:57] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon Sakiri Vasu Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the informant has to necessarily avail of the alternative remedy provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.
- நீதிபதிகள் ஜெகதீஷ் சந்திரா மற்றும் கலைமதி அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்த போது, தேர்தல் ஆணையம் தரப்பில், கண்காணிப்பு கேமராக்கள் செயலிழந்தது குறித்து அறிக்கை பெறப்பட்டுள்ளது. கூடுதல் கேமராக்களை நிறுவும்படியும், எந்த பிரச்னையும் ஏற்படாமல் பார்த்துக் கொள்ளுபடியும் மாவட்ட தேர்தல் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு அறிவுறுத்தப்பட்டுள்ளது
More
Recent Posts
- Justice AD Jagadish Chandira says, there’s a doubt whether the injuries were sustained during the road accident or inside Coimbatore prison. Now that inquiry had been conducted by DLSA, the HCP can be closed by directing officials to consider his mother’s representation.[09/05, 11:27] sekarreporter1: JUDGES CLOSE THE HCP with a direction to consider a representation made by Savukku Shankar’s mother for change of prison
- AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONERI, K.Selvaperunthagai, S/o.Kuppuswamy, Indian, aged about 64 Years, President of Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (Indian National Congress), Sathyamurthy Bhavan, 40, Thiru Vi Ka Salai, Chennai 600 002, residing at B15, Tower Block, TNHB Officer Quarters, Taylor Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 600010 do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows: counsel on record Advocates suriya prakasam , chandramohan, victor,damodaran, D selvam , navash , venkadesh, sasikumar,
- [08/05, 19:16] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE COMPLAINT UNDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 IS MAINTAINABLE AFTER OBTAINING THE DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY MUTUAL CONSENT?
- [09/05, 08:57] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon Sakiri Vasu Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the informant has to necessarily avail of the alternative remedy provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.
- நீதிபதிகள் ஜெகதீஷ் சந்திரா மற்றும் கலைமதி அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்த போது, தேர்தல் ஆணையம் தரப்பில், கண்காணிப்பு கேமராக்கள் செயலிழந்தது குறித்து அறிக்கை பெறப்பட்டுள்ளது. கூடுதல் கேமராக்களை நிறுவும்படியும், எந்த பிரச்னையும் ஏற்படாமல் பார்த்துக் கொள்ளுபடியும் மாவட்ட தேர்தல் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு அறிவுறுத்தப்பட்டுள்ளது