Follow:
- Next story sekarreporter1: மதியம் உணவு சாப்பிட கூட செல்லாமல் நீதிபதி cvkj தொடர்ந்து தீர்ப்பு வழங்கி வருகிறார்
- Previous story [7/14, 10:59] sekarreporter1: KS: For this Chapter VIII in PMLA MiLord, just come to Chapter VIII. It starts at page 48 and says there shall be following classes of authorities for the purpose of this Act for the purpose of searches, surveys and seizures. That is their power. [7/14, 10:59] sekarreporter1: KS: PMLA empowers ED to only conduct an inquiry and not an investigation. (He is now reading paragraphs from SC judgement in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary’s case and asks the judge to readily compare it with the provisions of PMLA.) [7/14, 11:00] sekarreporter1: KS: ED officials are not police authorities. They are supposed to do only what is obligated under the Act. SC says ED powers may have a semblance of an investigation only because it involves search and seizure. Such semblance is also only to satisfy the adjudicating authority [7/14, 11:00] sekarreporter1: KS: So, how do they take them to a Magistrate for remand. What happens is the constitutional provision of producing an arrested person before a Magistrate within 24 hours comes into play. [7/14, 11:01] sekarreporter1: KS: I would submit as far as PMLA is concerned, ED has no police powers at all. They are neither officers in charge of a police station, that provision is absent under PMLA. [7/14, 11:02] sekarreporter1: KS: Deepak Mahajan was only on the issue of judicial custody. Number 2 and this is very interesting. If you look at FERA, you will find in Sec 45 power of police officer to arrest. There is section 35 giving power to ED to produce before Magistrate. I’ll explain why [7/14, 11:03] sekarreporter1: KS: PMLA empowers ED to summons bank officials, financial institutions and brokers who deal with finances. Once all that evidence is collected, it is the same evidence that would be used to file a complaint. I don’t say so, SC says.
Recent Posts
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.
- E Pass/ ooty/ kodaikanal/ order/W. P.No.15120 of 2019andW.M.P.Nos.15112 of 2019, 31696 of 2023 & 8422 of 2024N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.ANDD. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.W.P.No.15120 of 2019:Issue relating to Carrying CapacityThis matter relates to fixation of carrying capacity in respect of theNilgiris District and Dindigul District.
- Coram:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRANCrl.O.P.No.10011 of 2024&Crl.M.P.Nos.6874 & 6875 of 2024H.Raja .. Petitioner/
- ] RUPERT Mhc Advt: Section 198 M.V.Act -Unauthorised interference with vehicle. – Whoever otherwise than with lawful authority or reasonable excuse enters or moves any stationary motor vehicle or tampers with the brake or any part of the mechanism of a motor vehicle shall be punishable with fine of one thousand rupees.
- 01/05, 23:43] Advt Purusothaman: https://youtu.be/drUxhA2Gy48?si=4GUeTfm9uzuIDUmh[01/05, 23:53] Advt Purusothaman: Learned AG P.S.Raman Sir in his speech in farewell function of Honble Justice G.Chandrasekaran refers among his Lordship’s commendable judgements, first case referred is Muthulakshmi vs State in which his Lordship awarded 15 Lakhs compensation to a victim whose husband died under mysterious circumstances in Coimbatore Government Hospital even though the deceased was alive for fourteen days and this was concealed from the family till his death by Police who only sent him by ambulance to hospital.
More
Recent Posts
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.
- E Pass/ ooty/ kodaikanal/ order/W. P.No.15120 of 2019andW.M.P.Nos.15112 of 2019, 31696 of 2023 & 8422 of 2024N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.ANDD. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.W.P.No.15120 of 2019:Issue relating to Carrying CapacityThis matter relates to fixation of carrying capacity in respect of theNilgiris District and Dindigul District.
- Coram:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRANCrl.O.P.No.10011 of 2024&Crl.M.P.Nos.6874 & 6875 of 2024H.Raja .. Petitioner/
- ] RUPERT Mhc Advt: Section 198 M.V.Act -Unauthorised interference with vehicle. – Whoever otherwise than with lawful authority or reasonable excuse enters or moves any stationary motor vehicle or tampers with the brake or any part of the mechanism of a motor vehicle shall be punishable with fine of one thousand rupees.
- 01/05, 23:43] Advt Purusothaman: https://youtu.be/drUxhA2Gy48?si=4GUeTfm9uzuIDUmh[01/05, 23:53] Advt Purusothaman: Learned AG P.S.Raman Sir in his speech in farewell function of Honble Justice G.Chandrasekaran refers among his Lordship’s commendable judgements, first case referred is Muthulakshmi vs State in which his Lordship awarded 15 Lakhs compensation to a victim whose husband died under mysterious circumstances in Coimbatore Government Hospital even though the deceased was alive for fourteen days and this was concealed from the family till his death by Police who only sent him by ambulance to hospital.