SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!

Uncategorized

முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!

முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!

The Madras High Court Advocates Association would like to point out that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, a Statutory Body under the Advocates Act, 1961, issues Vehicles Stickers to enrolled advocates after verification of their RC Books & Enrolment Certificates, with the Vehicle Registration Number and Hologram. This is meant for seamless entry and parking on Court campuses and not to seek immunity from traffic rules. A clear distinction needs to be made between the issue of such authorised stickers by a statutory body and advocate stickers sold on pavements which even non-advocates may end up misusing.

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court Advocates Association would like to point out that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, a Statutory Body under the Advocates Act, 1961, issues Vehicles Stickers to enrolled advocates after verification of their RC Books & Enrolment Certificates, with the Vehicle Registration Number and Hologram. This is meant for seamless entry and parking on Court campuses and not to seek immunity from traffic rules. A clear distinction needs to be made between the issue of such authorised stickers by a statutory body and advocate stickers sold on pavements which even non-advocates may end up misusing.

[29/04, 11:51] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1784830190276989405?t=qq9-ByRSkzU-9XU8K1wVxQ&s=08[29/04, 11:51] sekarreporter1: [29/04, 11:44] Mohanakrishnan President Mhaa: STATEMENT The Chennai City Traffic Police has issued a Press Note No.89/04/2024 dated 27.04.2024 on “Restriction of Unauthorised Stickers on Private Vehicles”. There...

[29/04, 11:38] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || கொடநாடு வழக்கு ஒத்திவைப்பு

Uncategorized

[29/04, 11:38] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || கொடநாடு வழக்கு ஒத்திவைப்பு

கொடநாடு கொலை, கொள்ளை வழக்கு விசாரணையை ஜூன் 21க்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது உதகை ஒருங்கிணைந்த நீதிமன்றம் இன்றைய விசாரணையில் குற்றம்சாட்டப்பட்டோர் தரப்பில் வாளையார் மனோஜ் மட்டுமே ஆஜர் சிபிசிஐடி தரப்பில், ஏடிஎஸ்பி முருகவேல் தலைமையிலான போலீசார், அரசு வழக்கறிஞர்கள் ஆஜர் Udhagai #KodanadCase #CBCID #ADSP #Police #ThanthiTV...

[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .

[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found...

today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial

Uncategorized

today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial

[29/04, 10:10] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has...

[29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:

Uncategorized

[29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:

A judgment which does not contain the bare minimum facts, the point for determination, the evidence adduced and the application of those facts and evidence for deciding the issue would not qualify it to...

There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b

Uncategorized

There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b

There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional...

முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா

Uncategorized

முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா

முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா என விளக்கமளிக்க, மனுதாரருக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. கடந்த 1996-2001ம் ஆண்டுகளில் திமுக ஆட்சியில்...