Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All India criminal LR 574 : P Appala Raju vs state : In a criminal trial two views possible from evidence , one favourable to prosecution and other to accused , view favourable to accused should be taken into consideration [10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian:
[10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All India criminal LR 574 : P Appala Raju vs state : In a criminal trial two views possible from evidence , one favourable to prosecution and other to accused , view favourable to accused should be taken into consideration
[10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) All India criminal LR 427 : Ajoy bhattacharjee vs state of west bengal : In a criminal proceedings a lame prosecution cannot endeavor to stand on its feet holding the defence as a helping stick
[10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian: 2018(7) MLJ 138 : Ganesan K vs government of Tamil Nadu : ” motive of giving or securing bribe relating to promise of favourable official act is sufficient to constitute bribe , capacity to perform such promise is not necessary
[10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC (cri ) 307 : Ramswaroop vs state of MP : In a murder case , the court cannot impose a lesser sentence than what is prescribed in law
[10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian: 2018(3) SCC ( cri ) 710: inspector of police vs S Selvi : SC sec 227,228&239 CRPC / court cannot merely act as a post office or a mouth piece of prosecution , court has to consider broad probabilities of case ,
Total effect of statements and documents produced before court , infirmities appearing in case
[10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian: 2005 (5) SCC 136 : Gurpal singh vs state of punjab : public interest litigation will not lie in cases of personal and political rivalry
[10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian: 1999 (1) SCC 271 : sabia khan vs state of UP : filing totally misconceived petition amounts to abuse of process of court and waste of courts time , such litigant is not required to be dealt with lightly
[10/31, 16:00] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 801 : state vs S Rajaram : wrong order in one case cannot be basis for compelling public authority to pass similar order in any other case ( art 14 constitution of india )
[10/31, 16:01] Vinothpandian: 1999 (2) SCC 458 : Ishar singh vs district & sessions judge : persons taking cover of religious practice to defeat process of law is not entitled to any equitable considerations
