Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )

[10/5, 20:00] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[10/5, 20:00] Vinothpandian: AIR 1960 punj 307 : kishan singh vs state of punjab : The general policy of the law is to allow bail rather than refuse it and bail should not be witheld as a measure of punishment or for the purpose of putting obstacles in the way of defence ( sec 436 CRPC )
[10/5, 20:00] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) SCC 10 : Prithipal singh vs state of punjab : For offences under IPC , torture is not permissible whether it occurs during investigation , interrogation or otherwise
[10/5, 20:00] Vinothpandian: 2005 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 96 : parminder kaur vs state of punjab : Regarding violation of human rights and fundamental rights , party has right to claim compensation and can resort to art 226 of the constitution to enforce its right
[10/5, 20:00] Vinothpandian: 2020 (6) CTC 198 ; Abhilasha vs parkash SC : Hindu father morally and legally liable to maintain his unmarried daughter , said principle is incorporated in section 20 ( 3) of hindu adoptions and maintenance act 1956
[10/5, 20:00] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 539 : shanthimalai trust thiruvanamalai vs Arunachala education and environment development trust : civil court shall not proceed to pass exparte judgement within 30 days from the date of service of summons in suit , if so judgement passed would be in breach of mandatory requirement of order 5 rule 1 CPC 1908